At a first glance it looks like the libc has been partiallyupgraded, and that you now have a mix of both 2.21 and 2.22.I have attached a screenshot of what I'm Let me work on this and post you updates. Explore Labs Configuration Deployment Troubleshooting Security Additional Tools Red Hat Access plug-ins Red Hat Satellite Certificate Tool Red Hat Insights Increase visibility into IT operations to detect and resolve technical issues Is apt broken for any other person? this contact form
It sounds from your description like you have a whole slew of incorrect libraries installed in /lib that are munging your system. Hot Network Questions Print some JSON Problem of display in tikz If the square root of two is irrational, why can it be created by dividing two numbers? My libc.so.6 in /lib/ points to libc-2.15.so in the same folder. c) Is the problem, as I suspect, to do with the libglib* files? https://access.redhat.com/solutions/46123
Need access to an account?If your company has an existing Red Hat account, your organization administrator can grant you access. You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. Please advice. alexandre.t View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by alexandre.t 04-27-2009, 12:31 AM #3 gemini42 LQ Newbie Registered: Apr 2009 Posts:
Or create a directory with the necessary old libraries and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to force the linker to load those libraries preferentially. I removed it and will try upgradingin a snapshot so that if it still breaks I can always revert.- Chiraag ಚಿರಾಗ್ ನಟರಾಜ್ 2016-03-12 16:30:02 UTC PermalinkRaw Message Post by Aurelien JarnoThanks Learn more about Red Hat subscriptions Product(s) Red Hat Enterprise Linux Category Developer Tags glibc rhel_6 Quick Links Downloads Subscriptions Support Cases Customer Service Product Documentation Help Contact Us Log-in Assistance Meanwhile I talked with the vendor and he suggests me to use RHEL3 or RHEL4.
When I observe less /lib/libc.so.6 I observe the binary content. I am running Ubuntu 9.10, kernel 2.6.31-20-generic. Does the Iron Man movie ever establish a convincing motive for the main villain? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572569 Why were Native American code talkers used during WW2?
Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies. Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. How to search for flights for a route staying within in an alliance? (Seemingly) simple trigonometry problem Accidentally modified .bashrc and now I cant login despite entering password correctly Would it Open Source Communities Subscriptions Downloads Support Cases Account Back Log In Register Red Hat Account Number: Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance My Profile Notifications Help Log
apt share|improve this question edited May 10 '14 at 3:02 Braiam 39.2k1693154 asked Apr 16 '14 at 13:26 Rémi Benoit 19117 [PLEASE ADD TO COMMENT I JUST NEED CLARIFICATION] symbolic-link glibc rstudio share|improve this question asked Sep 30 at 14:21 OfOurOwn 61 add a comment| 1 Answer 1 active oldest votes up vote 0 down vote There's something pretty suspicious If so, how do I do this? Are there any pan-social laws?
a) Is the problem to do with the kernel - did the update try to update the kernel as I note that there is a new stable release (2.6.33-2)? weblink ABI stability for private symbols is not guaranteed and, frankly, I'm not sure why you'd be linking to it at all. Any distribution using glibc 2.3 and below are almost guaranteed to have LinuxThreads compiled in. If so, how do I fix it?
Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Here's how it works: Anybody can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the Find More Posts by Alien Bob 12-13-2010, 10:24 AM #11 gnashley Amigo developer Registered: Dec 2003 Location: Germany Distribution: Slackware Posts: 4,842 Rep: You probably can use that with Blogs Recent Entries Best Entries Best Blogs Blog List Search Blogs Home Forums HCL Reviews Tutorials Articles Register Search Search Forums Advanced Search Search Tags Search LQ Wiki Search Tutorials/Articles Search navigate here This fixes the GLIBC not found, but running rstudio --run-diagnostics now says: R session launched, attempting to connect on port 13345... /usr/lib/rstudio/bin/rsession: relocation error: /lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol h_errno, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined
gemini42 View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by gemini42 12-13-2010, 07:42 AM #9 gmad22 LQ Newbie Registered: Dec 2010 Posts: Search this Thread 04-25-2009, 02:16 AM #1 gemini42 LQ Newbie Registered: Apr 2009 Posts: 4 Rep: ERROR :version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference Hi ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: libc6 2.23-0ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-18.34-generic 4.4.6 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-18-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Apr 20 16:15:39 2016 Dependencies: gcc-6-base 6.0.1-0ubuntu1 libc6 2.23-0ubuntu3
I am a newbie to linux and slackware. Red Hat Account Number: Red Hat Account Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance Customer Portal My Profile Notifications Help For your security, if you’re on a public gemini42 View Public Profile View LQ Blog View Review Entries View HCL Entries Find More Posts by gemini42 05-26-2010, 05:59 PM #8 gemini42 LQ Newbie Registered: Apr 2009 Posts: If you just try to replace glibc, other libraries will complain about GLIBC_2.7 and GLIBC_2.4, so you need every library to be contemporary.
Do you want to help us debug the posting issues ? < is the place to report it, thanks ! Otherwise my system is fine. How to describe very tasty and probably unhealthy food Can a secure cookie be set from an insecure HTTP connection? his comment is here Setup a chroot on your existing Slackware system with an older release of a distribution.
http://www.howtoforge.com/forums/showthread.php?t=446 Those issues are not at bootup, but after upgrading specific program and starting them where they got similar issue. At a first glance it looks like the libc has been partiallyupgraded, and that you now have a mix of both 2.21 and 2.22.I have attached a screenshot of what I'm Changed in glibc (Ubuntu): status: New → Invalid See full activity log To post a comment you must log in. Are there other Pokemon with higher spawn rates right now?
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1324375). I have also run the update command to update libc, which is already the newest version. panic+0xa7/0x16f [
Product Security Center Security Updates Security Advisories Red Hat CVE Database Security Labs Keep your systems secure with Red Hat's specialized responses for high-priority security vulnerabilities. We Acted. If you have the source code, try to change lines 'extern int errno;' to '#include
View Responses Resources Overview Security Blog Security Measurement Severity Ratings Backporting Policies Product Signing (GPG) Keys Discussions Red Hat Enterprise Linux Red Hat Virtualization Red Hat Satellite Customer Portal Private Groups Join our community today! Not the answer you're looking for? A bug has also been posted but has yet to be assigned: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...kg/+bug/486576 I tried to upgrade Empathy from 2.28 to 2.30 via Synaptic but the upgrade always failed as there
Unfortunately, it seems that that you are stuck with a NPTL/TLS-only glibc.