So, what can you do? Issue Received below given error in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Server. So - the question is: How do I do this? Main Menu LQ Calendar LQ Rules LQ Sitemap Site FAQ View New Posts View Latest Posts Zero Reply Threads LQ Wiki Most Wanted Jeremy's Blog Report LQ Bug Syndicate Latest this contact form
Kernel panic - not syncing : Attempted to kill init! Hot Network Questions How do you say "enchufado" in English? I don't know why the only thing broken on my setup was apache/php4 Cheers Alban Tags added: fixed-in-experimental Request was from GOTO Masanori
This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. Rojo is Hiring! - http://www.rojonetworks.com/JobsAtRojo.html If you're interested in RSS, Weblogs, Social Networking, etc... I was hoping that my licentious reading of "or later" would be enough to avoid a downgrade to 3.6!
Top terabite Posts: 6 Joined: 2006/02/20 04:41:06 Location: Sydney Re: version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 Quote Postby terabite » 2006/02/27 22:12:56 Thanks for the quick response Lenard,Q1. Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.32-504.3.3.el6.x86_64 #1 Call Trace: [
WD-peczis:/lib# /usr/local/sbin/updateFirmwareFromFile.sh /DataVolume/shares/Public/sq-040104-422-20150423.deb basename: relocation error: /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_find_dso_for_object, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux-armhf.so.3 with link time reference date: relocation error: /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_find_dso_for_object, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in Product Security Center Security Updates Security Advisories Red Hat CVE Database Security Labs Keep your systems secure with Red Hat's specialized responses for high-priority security vulnerabilities. Receive this error during boot up. https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1475913 When a girl mentions her girlfriend, does she mean it like lesbian girlfriend?
Now, however, I get the following error: $ THEANO_FLAGS=mode=FAST_RUN,floatX=float32 python train.py python: relocation error: /data1/software/analysis/libc.2.14/lib64/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 with link time reference Oddly enough, I https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-07/msg00616.html Open Source Communities Subscriptions Downloads Support Cases Account Back Log In Register Red Hat Account Number: Account Details Newsletter and Contact Preferences User Management Account Maintenance My Profile Notifications Help Log Kevin A. Thanks Mark Mark Cuss, B.
New employee has offensive Slack handle due to language barrier (Seemingly) simple trigonometry problem Why do composite foreign keys need a separate unique constraint? http://supercgis.com/relocation-error/relocation-error-lib-i686-libc-so-6.html Last edited by johnsfine; 10-08-2010 at 09:04 AM. 1 members found this post helpful. Processing triggers for libc-bin ... /usr/bin/dpkg: relocation error: /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_find_dso_for_object, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux-armhf.so.3 with link time reference E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (127) WDMyCloud:~# Somehow I had older version of ld left inside /usr/lib.
Accidentally modified .bashrc and now I cant login despite entering password correctly Are voltage and current sources linear or nonlinear? Reported by: Martin Thorsen Ranang
Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers
Notices Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
Full text and rfc822 format available. Perhaps not.Can you provide any background on the general nature of this error - is it symptomatic of 2.4 binaries finding themselves suddenly on a 2.6 platform - with new libraries Also see irc.freenode.net #rojo if you want to chat. We Acted.
Only "cd" command works... Copy sent to GNU Libc Maintainers
Shouldn't my setting of LD_LIBRARY_PATH have taken care of that? Good question - the doc does mention 2.4.x or later - I take 2.6 to be later! Hess - But is there any reason to think I won't see the error I already get when I try to run train.py? –user1245262 Mar 13 '15 at 3:22 add a Cloud Storage My Cloud leigh258 2014-08-24 17:02:09 UTC #1 Hey, well i was trying to install Minidlna, got in to an error and thought id follow what the log said...
It fails to run with a following message:~$ skype /usr/lib32/skype/skype: relocation error: /usr/lib32/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_find_dso_for_object, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time referenceI have tried to reinstall all IIRC, the old version of debian glibc handled with this situation correctly, but the current script seems broken. Examples of problem: $ cat cat: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with link time reference $ ls ls: relocation error: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0: symbol __libc_stack_end, version Open Source Communities Comments Helpful Follow How to fix "relocation error: /usr/lib64/libc.so.6: symbol _dl_starting_up, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 with link time reference" on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6?
I'll try to fix it and put -2 hopefully soon. Top Lenard Posts: 2283 Joined: 2005/11/29 02:35:25 Location: Indiana Re: version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file libc.so.6 Quote Postby Lenard » 2006/02/28 14:09:14 terabite wrote:Thanks for the quick response Lenard,Q1. I wanted to remove the link libc.so.6 -> /lib64/tls/libc-2.3.2.so to change it to an other file (libc-2.3.4.so). You should download file http://ftp.altlinux.org/pub/people/boyarsh/wd/libc.so.6 (or extract /lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libc-2.17.so from firmware image and name it libc.so.6) and put it on share.
Perhaps not.Yes the 2.6 kernel series is later then the 2.4 kernel series, but they are vastly different in many ways.....Can you provide any background on the general nature of this Acknowledgement sent to [email protected]: Extra info received and forwarded to list.